The case against the boycott

1.  Crimea was once a part of Russia.  The Crimean War was between Russia on one hand and England and France on the other.

3.  Kruschev gave Crimea to Ukraine as a goodwill gesture when Ukraine was still part of the USSR.

4.  The boycott will hurt Europe and America and has the potential to escalate into even more hurtful outcome, such as Russia becoming a haven for rogue financiers.

5.  The boycott will not result in Crimea's return to Ukraine.

http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/19/this-is-what-happens-when-a-community-organizer-quarrels-with-a-kgb-agent/

Related articles

• Crisis in the Ukraine
• Live: Germany says EU to impose more sanctions on Russia - Firstpost
• Crimea: where does it belong?
• Crimean Government Tells Tatars to Leave Their Lands
• The focus is on Crimea, but next is the fight for Ukraine | Timothy Garton Ash
• [UK-911-Truth] President Putin's speech to Russian parliament over Crimea - cem
• Reaching for a deal on Crimea
• Ukraine crisis: landslide victory for Russia in Crimea vote
• Fencing-Ukraine teams to boycott Russia events over Crimea death
• Crimea crisis: The best we can do for Ukraine is help it prosper