 |
| Edward Everett Hale, ca.1855 (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
FFF
Articles
by October 22, 2004
A 19th-century writer, Edward
Everett Hale, once published a story called “The Man without a Country.” The
protagonist is Philip Nolan, a young U.S. Army officer who unwisely deserted to
join the ill-fated effort of Aaron Burr to establish an independent empire west
of the Mississippi. In Hale’s yarn, during his court martial for treason Nolan
shouts, “Damn the United States! I wish I may never hear of the United States
again!” The shocked presiding judge obliges, handing down the following
sentence on September 23, 1807: “Prisoner, hear the sentence of the Court! The
Court decides, subject to the approval of the President, that you never hear
the name of the United States again.” And for the next half century Nolan lives
out his life on board one U.S. Navy ship or another, never permitted to read an
American newspaper or see his native soil — the man without a country.
Two hundred years later, life is
emulating art. Last week the U.S. Supreme Court heard the appeal of Daniel
Benitez, a 45-year-old Cuban immigrant, who has been held in federal custody
since 2001. Benitez, a Cuban national, was among the thousands of “Mariel boat
people” who sailed from that Cuban port in 1980, when Fidel Castro temporarily
opened his island fiefdom to emigration.
Granted an immigration parole
shortly after landing on a South Florida beach, Benitez was convicted of
second-degree grand theft in 1983. When he was released from prison he applied
for permanent residence in the United States. The Immigration and
Naturalization Service denied his application on grounds of moral turpitude,
citing the 1983 conviction. Benitez remained in migrant limbo until 1993, when
he pled guilty in another Florida courtroom to a laundry list of felonies, including
armed burglary and illegal possession of a firearm. The plea brought a 20-year
sentence down on him.
This time around the INS ruled that
continuation of Benitez’s immigration parole was “against the public interest.”
And so the agency revoked it. In 2001 he was released into federal custody. The
agency’s Cuban Review Panel at first found him releasable, when a suitable
halfway house could sponsor him. But in 2003, the U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Service, a successor to the INS under the Department of Homeland
Security, revoked the Notice of Releaseability, on the basis of an allegation
of a planned escape from jail. USCIS reached this decision without a hearing.
Bottom line: Benitez is an inadmissible alien so far as the United States is
concerned.
Now here’s the catch: although
Benitez is a native Cuban and still technically a Cuban citizen, Cuba, like
Uncle Sam, wants no part of him. The Cuban government will not take him back.
He is, quite literally, a man without a country.
Daniel Benitez is not the only
immigrant enduring indefinite U.S. incarceration. The immigrant-advocacy group
Human Rights First estimates that more than 2,000 “Philip Nolans” from around
the world are in the same spot. And the federal courts are divided about how
all these cases should be handled. Consequently, the Supreme Court consolidated
two such cases from federal courts of appeals into Benitez v. Wallis.
In an amicus curiae brief, Human Rights First, Amnesty International, and Human
Rights Watch wrote,
No
misuse of government power is more clearly established as a violation of
international law than the practice of prolonged arbitrary detention. The right
not to be unjustly detained, so central to our concept of ordered liberty, is
articulated in the earliest documents on personal liberty as well as in the
declarations, covenants, treaties, and constitutions that embody modern
international law and the laws of free states. Indeed, the right is universally
recognized among the democratic nations and among the international bodies that
represent the nations of the world.
Nobody is suggesting that Daniel
Benitez is a martyr or a saint. Like Hale’s Philip Nolan, he is a criminal
whose ill-considered words and deeds made him deserving of punishment. But once
having paid his debt to our society, should he languish in prison for another
20 or 30 years — at our expense, fellow taxpayers — because neither America nor
Cuba wants him walking the streets?
In the overcrowded, underdeveloped
world in which most members of our species struggle to survive, America remains
what Thomas Jefferson called our country — the last, best hope of the world.
Since 9/11, we are much more reluctant to play that role. But it’s one which we
should not avoid. Benitez v. Wallis well may be a litmus test of
how history will remember us. Will ours be the era in which America’s
dedication to liberty, due process, and the rule of law were relegated to
history’s dustbin for the sake of an illusory sense of security?
No comments:
Post a Comment