Saturday, April 23, 2011

Was a good general driven into retirement by shabby reporting?

A Pentagon investigation has found insufficient evidence that General Stanley McChrystal, the former US and Nato commander in Afghanistan sacked by Barack Obama last year, violated military policy.

McChrystal’s dismissal came after publication of an article in Rolling Stone, The Runaway General, which portrayed him and his inner circle as being out of control, and making contemptuous and dismissive remarks about the US civilian leadership…

The investigation expressed doubts about the version of some events reported in the article, written by Michael Hastings, who spent several days with McChrystal and his team. The investigation added that it could not substantiate some of the quotes.

The investigation, carried out by the Pentagon’s office of inspector general, concluded: “The evidence was insufficient to substantiate a violation of applicable department of defense standards with respect to any of the incidents on which we focused. Not all of the events at issue occurred as reported in the article…A polite way of saying Hastings is a liar and Rolling Stone is opportunist and unconcerned with journalistic standards.
More: http://eideard.wordpress.com/2011/04/19/pentagon-reports-mcchrystal-did-not-violate-us-military-policy/

See the full report here: http://www.dodig.mil/fo/Foia/PDFs/ROI-508.pdf

See the 2010 Rolling Stone article here: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-runaway-general-20100622

No comments:

Post a Comment