|
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
A NAFSA Webinar on surviving a federal immigration review at your school
Call for Papers: Association for the Study of the Middle East and Africa
Image via Wikipedia
|
Honestly... I'm sick of writing about this topic
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/28/ohio-school-shooting-victim_n_1307438.html
One TV commentator this morning called the latest school shooting "unimaginable." Unfortunately, it's become easy to imagine.
I've been writing about such shootings for years now:
http://www.todayscampus.com/articles/load.aspx?art=218
http://www.todayscampus.com/articles/load.aspx?art=227
http://www.todayscampus.com/articles/load.aspx?art=236
http://www.todayscampus.com/articles/load.aspx?art=238
We Americans certainly love our guns... and our nukes. My fear is that, as Americans inevitably slip still farther behind in the global economic race, the temptation will be overwhelming --- both at the national and the individual levels --- to turn to military force and personal vigilanteism.
Honestly... I'm just plain sick of the whole topic. And writing about it doesn't seem to help.
That TV commentator, quoted above added, now the community has turned its attention to mourning and remembrance. It's the same old script.
Our schools have improved their lock-down procedures and adopted zero-tolerance policies where weapons are concerned. And still the tragedies occur.
Why? Because we have not addressed the causes.
One TV commentator this morning called the latest school shooting "unimaginable." Unfortunately, it's become easy to imagine.
I've been writing about such shootings for years now:
http://www.todayscampus.com/articles/load.aspx?art=218
http://www.todayscampus.com/articles/load.aspx?art=227
http://www.todayscampus.com/articles/load.aspx?art=236
http://www.todayscampus.com/articles/load.aspx?art=238
September 22, 2007
When Will All These Classroom Killings Stop?
A piece I wrote several months ago concerning a classroom shooting incident in Pennsylvania seems to be just a pertinent today:
When Will These Classroom Killings Stop?
By
Jim Castagnera
On Monday a crazy gunman opened fire in a Virginia Tech residence hall and a little later in a classroom across campus, killing some 30 people in what is being labeled “the deadliest shooting rampage in U.S. history.” The gunman subsequently was killed, bringing the death toll to 31. As I wrote this column, no one knew the murder’s motive.
Virginia Tech’s president was quoted by the Associated Press as saying, “Today the university was struck with a tragedy that we consider of monumental proportions. The university is shocked and indeed horrified."
In 21st century America we have almost come to accept these horrible mass murders as natural disasters. This community has been hit by a hurricane. That one has been torn up by a tornado. Oh, and that one over there has been blasted by a madman with a gun. The Tech student body no doubt will be afforded free access to “grief counselors.”
We used to say, "Everybody talks about the weather, but no one does anything about it." Should we now say, "Everybody talks about gun violence, but no one does anything about it?" Living here in suburban Philadelphia, I watched as the City of Brotherly Love averaged one homicide per day in 2006. Philly passed the 100-homicide mark during the first quarter of ’07, suggesting it well may be on its way to breaking last year’s record. Here, too, students are, often as not, counted among the innocent victims of gun violence gone out of control.
Yeh, I know… guns don't kill people, people kill people. But these killers are better armed than ever before. When I was a Franklin and Marshall College student a lifetime ago, I witnessed plenty of fights, often of the town v. gown variety. A group of fraternity punks, such as myself, might get a bit rowdy in a local tavern. The blue-collar crowd at the opposite end of the bar might take umbrage. The upshot might then be a quick exchange of fisticuffs. On a rare occasion a knife or a broken bottle could come into play.
My point is: almost nobody carried a gun.
By contrast today, if you are confronted by a belligerent bar fly, run for your car.
Odds are better than even the guy is packing.
No need to look for trouble in a local bar, however. Virginia Tech is not the only school where guns have gotten into classrooms. Just last year a local high school student entered one of our county’s Catholic high schools, discharged his father’s AK-47, then shot himself. We could only be grateful that the troubled youth didn’t first kill his classmates, making Delaware County the scene of a new Columbine massacre.
The Canadian college professor, Marshall McLuhan - best known during my college days for saying "The medium is the message" - asserted that Americans live in "Bonanzaland," i.e., the Wild West of the 1880s. Well, folks, that time is long past. Our K-12 schools have rightly adopted zero-tolerance policies toward weapons in their halls and classrooms. Colleges, too, have clamped down on violence --- even the fisticuffs of my era.
Obviously, this isn’t enough.
Neither are grief counselors enough.
The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution may give us all the right to bear arms… though some judges and scholars have questioned the Supreme Court’s reading of that bit of the Bill of Rights. Regardless of what rights we want to read into the Second Amendment, I say our daughters and sons have a higher right: to enjoy and benefit from their educations without looking over their shoulders and wondering whether today is the day their classroom is riddled with bullets.
I don’t have the answer, folks. I just know in my guts that, until we dispense with the grief counselors and the platitudes, and get mad as hell about travesties like this latest massacre at Virginia Tech, the killing is just going to continue.
By
Jim Castagnera
On Monday a crazy gunman opened fire in a Virginia Tech residence hall and a little later in a classroom across campus, killing some 30 people in what is being labeled “the deadliest shooting rampage in U.S. history.” The gunman subsequently was killed, bringing the death toll to 31. As I wrote this column, no one knew the murder’s motive.
Virginia Tech’s president was quoted by the Associated Press as saying, “Today the university was struck with a tragedy that we consider of monumental proportions. The university is shocked and indeed horrified."
In 21st century America we have almost come to accept these horrible mass murders as natural disasters. This community has been hit by a hurricane. That one has been torn up by a tornado. Oh, and that one over there has been blasted by a madman with a gun. The Tech student body no doubt will be afforded free access to “grief counselors.”
We used to say, "Everybody talks about the weather, but no one does anything about it." Should we now say, "Everybody talks about gun violence, but no one does anything about it?" Living here in suburban Philadelphia, I watched as the City of Brotherly Love averaged one homicide per day in 2006. Philly passed the 100-homicide mark during the first quarter of ’07, suggesting it well may be on its way to breaking last year’s record. Here, too, students are, often as not, counted among the innocent victims of gun violence gone out of control.
Yeh, I know… guns don't kill people, people kill people. But these killers are better armed than ever before. When I was a Franklin and Marshall College student a lifetime ago, I witnessed plenty of fights, often of the town v. gown variety. A group of fraternity punks, such as myself, might get a bit rowdy in a local tavern. The blue-collar crowd at the opposite end of the bar might take umbrage. The upshot might then be a quick exchange of fisticuffs. On a rare occasion a knife or a broken bottle could come into play.
My point is: almost nobody carried a gun.
By contrast today, if you are confronted by a belligerent bar fly, run for your car.
Odds are better than even the guy is packing.
No need to look for trouble in a local bar, however. Virginia Tech is not the only school where guns have gotten into classrooms. Just last year a local high school student entered one of our county’s Catholic high schools, discharged his father’s AK-47, then shot himself. We could only be grateful that the troubled youth didn’t first kill his classmates, making Delaware County the scene of a new Columbine massacre.
The Canadian college professor, Marshall McLuhan - best known during my college days for saying "The medium is the message" - asserted that Americans live in "Bonanzaland," i.e., the Wild West of the 1880s. Well, folks, that time is long past. Our K-12 schools have rightly adopted zero-tolerance policies toward weapons in their halls and classrooms. Colleges, too, have clamped down on violence --- even the fisticuffs of my era.
Obviously, this isn’t enough.
Neither are grief counselors enough.
The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution may give us all the right to bear arms… though some judges and scholars have questioned the Supreme Court’s reading of that bit of the Bill of Rights. Regardless of what rights we want to read into the Second Amendment, I say our daughters and sons have a higher right: to enjoy and benefit from their educations without looking over their shoulders and wondering whether today is the day their classroom is riddled with bullets.
I don’t have the answer, folks. I just know in my guts that, until we dispense with the grief counselors and the platitudes, and get mad as hell about travesties like this latest massacre at Virginia Tech, the killing is just going to continue.
September 22, 2007 | Permalink
We Americans certainly love our guns... and our nukes. My fear is that, as Americans inevitably slip still farther behind in the global economic race, the temptation will be overwhelming --- both at the national and the individual levels --- to turn to military force and personal vigilanteism.
Honestly... I'm just plain sick of the whole topic. And writing about it doesn't seem to help.
That TV commentator, quoted above added, now the community has turned its attention to mourning and remembrance. It's the same old script.
Our schools have improved their lock-down procedures and adopted zero-tolerance policies where weapons are concerned. And still the tragedies occur.
Why? Because we have not addressed the causes.
Uncle Milty on higher education
Image via WikipediaRecognizing that Uncle Milty (aka Mitt Romney) will say anything to win votes and get his robo-butt into the desk chair of the Oval Office, here's what is available on his alleged views of higher education:
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/02/29/republican-candidates-record-higher-education
http://mittromney.com/issues/human-capital
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/02/29/republican-candidates-record-higher-education
http://mittromney.com/issues/human-capital
Robo-candidate stays in the race
Image via WikipediaRomney wins in Arizona and Michigan:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/29/mitt-romney-arizona-michigan-primaries?newsfeed=true
Some (admittedly quite liberal) colleagues and I were discussion Romney and Santorum yesterday. A few points made in the conversation:
1. Mitt (or Uncle Milty, as one colleague calls him) is, like W before him, a guy who was born on third base and believes he his a triple.
2. Does he believe in anything, other than being in the White House?
3. How can he be so insensitive to the values and feelings of ordinary Americans?
Here's a retrospective of "Bush {ilot," possibly the funniest satire produced during W's years in office:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBo9K05qCLg
Tell me it doesn't go double for Mitt.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/29/mitt-romney-arizona-michigan-primaries?newsfeed=true
Some (admittedly quite liberal) colleagues and I were discussion Romney and Santorum yesterday. A few points made in the conversation:
1. Mitt (or Uncle Milty, as one colleague calls him) is, like W before him, a guy who was born on third base and believes he his a triple.
2. Does he believe in anything, other than being in the White House?
3. How can he be so insensitive to the values and feelings of ordinary Americans?
Here's a retrospective of "Bush {ilot," possibly the funniest satire produced during W's years in office:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBo9K05qCLg
Tell me it doesn't go double for Mitt.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
A Victory for the Free Exchange of Knowledge
http://chronicle.com/article/Legislation-to-Bar/130949/?sid=pm&utm_source=pm&utm_medium=en
The bill that died aborning:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3699:
And the boycott that helped to abort it:
http://chronicle.com/article/As-Journal-Boycott-Grows/130600/
http://thecostofknowledge.com/
The bill that died aborning:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3699:
And the boycott that helped to abort it:
http://chronicle.com/article/As-Journal-Boycott-Grows/130600/
http://thecostofknowledge.com/
Monday, February 27, 2012
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Litigation against higher ed increases, due to promises we can't fulfill
Image via Wikipedia
One school that certainly isn’t doing so is the University of Pennsylvania. A couple of years ago, a news headline was, “Exec wins $435k in suit over nonexistent Wharton degree.” The winning plaintiff was a graduate of Penn’s Executive Master's in Technology Management (EMTM) program. His 2006 suit claimed the school misrepresented the offering, which was co-sponsored by the Wharton School, and taught by faculty in both the engineering school and Wharton. After investing a year in what he thought was a dual-degree program, Reynolds learned that Wharton would only award him a certificate and that he would not be deemed an alumnus of Penn’s prestigious business school.
Tenacious dental student
Even less likely to be inviting a lawsuit is the University of Michigan School of Dentistry, against whom expelled student, Alissa Zwick, won a $1.7 million verdict in December. Ms. Zwick began her dentistry studies back in 2002, and her troubles began a year later, when she performed poorly on exams and claimed to have trouble paying attention in class. A psychiatrist diagnosed attention deficit disorder. Zwick and her clinical faculty disagreed on reasonable accommodations. In May 2004, her continued shortfalls led to a dismissal by the school’s Academic Review Board. Zwick appealed and was reinstated.
Ms. Zwick continued to be plagued with poor grades. In June 2005, a number of faculty wrote uniformly negative letters concerning Zwick’s potential for success in the dental profession. Plaintiff was notified of another dismissal on June 20th, and argued her appeal before the Academic Review Board with counsel present on December 8, 2005. The board denied the appeal and again recommended dismissal. Plaintiff appealed that decision to the Executive Committee of the Dental School, and argued her appeal before the committee on January 11, 2006, losing again – and then dismissed from school.
Zwick was able to lay her grievances before a jury in a courtroom late last year. During the trial, her attorney, Deborah Gordon, elicited some damaging admissions from the school’s former dean (see adjacent box), which no doubt influenced the jury in rendering its banner verdict and $1.72 million award to Ms. Zwick.
Zwick trial testimony that did not help the University of Michigan’s defense
Q You would agree with me that based on Alissa's transcript, there is nothing to support your statement that she had deficits?
A I disagree.
Q Let's look and see what you said at your deposition. Page 89:
Q So is there anything on her transcript that you can see that would
legitimize your statement that the reason for the decision is past and continuing
clinical performance deficits?
A If this is the only information I have with which this deposition is based, I
would say she has a B in clinical.
Q So let me just sum this up then. Based on her transcript alone, just alone, you do not see any basis for your statement that she is being dismissed on past and
continuing clinical performance deficits.
Your answer: Just based on that, I can't extract anything other than that she did B
work.
A Okay. I will -- I agree.
Q Correct?
A Yes.
Q She's one of the few students in the D3 level that's ever been dismissed, correct?
A I can't recall who in the past has.
Q Very few, correct?
A Correct.
A sampler of relatively recent suits
• Radke v. University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign (U.S. District Court, Northern Illinois, 2009): A class action suit by applicants who claimed they were denied admission in favor of other applicants, who were on a university “clout list.” Result: Despite the political scandal this case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
• Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of California (California Court of Appeals, 2007): Professional program students claimed the university was obliged to maintain their fees at the same level as the year they were admitted. Result: The court agreed with the students. Furthermore, the state’s financial crisis did not constitute an emergency that excused the school from adhering to the implied contract in its catalog.
• Blake v. Career Education Corporation (U.S. District Court, Eastern Missouri, 2009): Students claimed that the defendant’s Sanford Brown College violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, when it claimed its associate and bachelor’s degrees in criminal justice were valuable. Plaintiffs claimed in fact they had very little practical, real-world value. Result: Case dismissed for failure to plead the facts of fraud with the specificity required by the state’s law.
• Diallo v. American InterContinental University (Georgia Court of Appeals, 2009): Students brought a fraud action, alleging the education they had received wasn’t worth its cost. Result: The courts denied class-action status to the students, but allowed individual students to go forward and try to prove their unique cases.
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/2/prweb9164650.htm
http://abovethelaw.com/2012/02/twelve-more-law-schools-slapped-with-class-action-lawsuits-over-employment-data/
http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/03/43614.htm
http://abovethelaw.com/2012/02/twelve-more-law-schools-slapped-with-class-action-lawsuits-over-employment-data/
http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/03/43614.htm
At the close of the 21st century’s first decade, no one working in higher education blithely challenges potential plaintiffs with the old saw, “So sue me!”
One school that certainly isn’t doing so is the University of Pennsylvania. A couple of years ago, a news headline was, “Exec wins $435k in suit over nonexistent Wharton degree.” The winning plaintiff was a graduate of Penn’s Executive Master's in Technology Management (EMTM) program. His 2006 suit claimed the school misrepresented the offering, which was co-sponsored by the Wharton School, and taught by faculty in both the engineering school and Wharton. After investing a year in what he thought was a dual-degree program, Reynolds learned that Wharton would only award him a certificate and that he would not be deemed an alumnus of Penn’s prestigious business school.
Tenacious dental student
Even less likely to be inviting a lawsuit is the University of Michigan School of Dentistry, against whom expelled student, Alissa Zwick, won a $1.7 million verdict in December. Ms. Zwick began her dentistry studies back in 2002, and her troubles began a year later, when she performed poorly on exams and claimed to have trouble paying attention in class. A psychiatrist diagnosed attention deficit disorder. Zwick and her clinical faculty disagreed on reasonable accommodations. In May 2004, her continued shortfalls led to a dismissal by the school’s Academic Review Board. Zwick appealed and was reinstated.
Ms. Zwick continued to be plagued with poor grades. In June 2005, a number of faculty wrote uniformly negative letters concerning Zwick’s potential for success in the dental profession. Plaintiff was notified of another dismissal on June 20th, and argued her appeal before the Academic Review Board with counsel present on December 8, 2005. The board denied the appeal and again recommended dismissal. Plaintiff appealed that decision to the Executive Committee of the Dental School, and argued her appeal before the committee on January 11, 2006, losing again – and then dismissed from school.
Zwick was able to lay her grievances before a jury in a courtroom late last year. During the trial, her attorney, Deborah Gordon, elicited some damaging admissions from the school’s former dean (see adjacent box), which no doubt influenced the jury in rendering its banner verdict and $1.72 million award to Ms. Zwick.
Zwick trial testimony that did not help the University of Michigan’s defense
Q You would agree with me that based on Alissa's transcript, there is nothing to support your statement that she had deficits?
A I disagree.
Q Let's look and see what you said at your deposition. Page 89:
Q So is there anything on her transcript that you can see that would
legitimize your statement that the reason for the decision is past and continuing
clinical performance deficits?
A If this is the only information I have with which this deposition is based, I
would say she has a B in clinical.
Q So let me just sum this up then. Based on her transcript alone, just alone, you do not see any basis for your statement that she is being dismissed on past and
continuing clinical performance deficits.
Your answer: Just based on that, I can't extract anything other than that she did B
work.
A Okay. I will -- I agree.
Q Correct?
A Yes.
Q She's one of the few students in the D3 level that's ever been dismissed, correct?
A I can't recall who in the past has.
Q Very few, correct?
A Correct.
A sampler of relatively recent suits
• Radke v. University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign (U.S. District Court, Northern Illinois, 2009): A class action suit by applicants who claimed they were denied admission in favor of other applicants, who were on a university “clout list.” Result: Despite the political scandal this case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
• Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of California (California Court of Appeals, 2007): Professional program students claimed the university was obliged to maintain their fees at the same level as the year they were admitted. Result: The court agreed with the students. Furthermore, the state’s financial crisis did not constitute an emergency that excused the school from adhering to the implied contract in its catalog.
• Blake v. Career Education Corporation (U.S. District Court, Eastern Missouri, 2009): Students claimed that the defendant’s Sanford Brown College violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, when it claimed its associate and bachelor’s degrees in criminal justice were valuable. Plaintiffs claimed in fact they had very little practical, real-world value. Result: Case dismissed for failure to plead the facts of fraud with the specificity required by the state’s law.
• Diallo v. American InterContinental University (Georgia Court of Appeals, 2009): Students brought a fraud action, alleging the education they had received wasn’t worth its cost. Result: The courts denied class-action status to the students, but allowed individual students to go forward and try to prove their unique cases.
An article on Syria by a friend and colleague, Prof. Amos Guiora
Amos N. Guiora
Professor of Law
University of Utah
S.J. Quinney College of Law
I think he raises some fair questions that are hard to answer.
"Generation Gasp" has made The Urban Dictionary
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=generation%20gasp
"You know, every time I talk to my dad, he says a few things that just bother the heck out of me, and I know it's just the generation gap rearing its proverbial head again. It happens so often now, but of course always in a friendly way between younger daughter and older father, that it's more like a generation gasp these days, than a generation gap!"
--- Claire Castagnera
"You know, every time I talk to my dad, he says a few things that just bother the heck out of me, and I know it's just the generation gap rearing its proverbial head again. It happens so often now, but of course always in a friendly way between younger daughter and older father, that it's more like a generation gasp these days, than a generation gap!"
--- Claire Castagnera
Court Reporter Transcripts --- allegedly real --- from a friend in Vittorio Venetto, Italy
lawyers (Photo credit: nishwater)
|
Saturday, February 25, 2012
The Generation Gasp: February 25, 2012
Image via Wikipediahttp://www.tnonline.com/2012/feb/25/it-time-knowledge-workers-union
Is it time for a knowledge workers' union?
Saturday, February 25, 2012
By CLAIRE AND JIM CASTAGNERA tneditortnonline.com
JIM:
Like so many men in hard coal country, my dad was a United Mine Worker. Before him, my grandpappy was Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers. During the 1950s and 1960s, one American worker out of three belonged to a labor union. No matter what your feelings about organized labor, the AFL-CIO was why men and women on the assembly lines of Detroit and Cleveland and Pittsburgh made it into the middle class. Good pay, generous health and pension plans, and job security weren't gifts from the Fords and Carnegies and Rockefellers of America. They were the hard-won trophies of organizing and collective bargaining strikes.
When first Japan, then China, and now South and Southeast Asia entered the global contest for manufacturing jobs, not even the most powerful labor unions could keep the multinational companies from closing plants and exporting those jobs overseas. But don't worry, we told our younger generations. You'll all go to college. You'll have the "brain" jobs. Let the Asians and Mexicans and South Americans have the "brawn" jobs.
The trouble is that the Chinese now have more kids in college than we do. Indian IT professionals, often educated at U.S. universities, are moving back home. For half the salary they'd make in America they can live twice as well in South India's answer to Silicon Valley.
American lawyers and accountants are no safer than their high-tech counterparts. Some East Coast law and CPA firms ship files off to offices in India and elsewhere on the other side of the globe. When the American law and accounting partners turn off the lights and go home for the evening, young attorneys and accountants half a world away are waking up and checking their email accounts for the work they'll be doing. Their work products will be waiting in the U.S. firms' email bins, when those partners boot up the next morning back in Jersey or New York.
The sad fact is that a good education no longer guarantees a high-paying position in America. Often, the 21st century version of the 20th century assembly line is a room full of cubicles equipped with computers.
Unions have fallen out of fashion. Only 6.9 percent of the private-sector workforce is organized today. To some extent, unions got what they deserved. John Mitchell of my dad's UMW called a nationwide strike in the midst of WWII. Jimmy Hoffa drove his Teamsters down the road to perdition. The Longshoremen were riddled with Reds. In other words, the big unions are no more immune to greed and megalomania than are the big banks and corporations.
Just the same, if the challenges facing the younger generation resemble those that faced their grandfathers, then maybe the solution is also similar: an International Knowledge Workers Union.
CLAIRE:
Technology is an amazing blessing, and a complex curse. Today many jobs can be accomplished from anywhere in the world, as long as there's an Internet connection nearby, and more and more employees are working from home part- or full-time. It's often more convenient for the employer and the employee, and almost always cheaper.
On the other hand, working remotely has the effect of turning real people into abstract concepts. I'm sure I'm not the first person to have ever gotten a bit ill tempered while talking on the phone to an IT worker about the problems I'm having with my Dell laptop - because let's face it, it's a lot easier to yell at some guy in India, whom you've never met before, over the phone than it is to yell at someone in person. It's difficult to feel a human connection with a distant, disembodied voice, and so we often treat those voices like machines rather than people.
Add to that the proliferation of social media websites, such as Facebook and Twitter, where people routinely gain thousands of "friends" without ever having a single meaningful interaction, and I think it's clear why any international union would be difficult to organize. Forming a group of people who have never met, whose members are no more than email addresses to one another, does not strike me as the most efficient path to camaraderie. How can we have our Norma Rae moment if we can barely even picture the people with whom we're supposed to be uniting?
Finally, because technology has made many jobs so mobile, those jobs simply can't be compared to more traditional forms of labor. A teachers' strike can be crippling to a community, but if a company's information technology workers (who happen to be working from China) go on strike, the infrastructure can be moved to different workers (living anywhere from India to Indianapolis) in no time at all. When employers have such flexibility, what leverage do the workers have?
Like so many men in hard coal country, my dad was a United Mine Worker. Before him, my grandpappy was Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers. During the 1950s and 1960s, one American worker out of three belonged to a labor union. No matter what your feelings about organized labor, the AFL-CIO was why men and women on the assembly lines of Detroit and Cleveland and Pittsburgh made it into the middle class. Good pay, generous health and pension plans, and job security weren't gifts from the Fords and Carnegies and Rockefellers of America. They were the hard-won trophies of organizing and collective bargaining strikes.
When first Japan, then China, and now South and Southeast Asia entered the global contest for manufacturing jobs, not even the most powerful labor unions could keep the multinational companies from closing plants and exporting those jobs overseas. But don't worry, we told our younger generations. You'll all go to college. You'll have the "brain" jobs. Let the Asians and Mexicans and South Americans have the "brawn" jobs.
The trouble is that the Chinese now have more kids in college than we do. Indian IT professionals, often educated at U.S. universities, are moving back home. For half the salary they'd make in America they can live twice as well in South India's answer to Silicon Valley.
American lawyers and accountants are no safer than their high-tech counterparts. Some East Coast law and CPA firms ship files off to offices in India and elsewhere on the other side of the globe. When the American law and accounting partners turn off the lights and go home for the evening, young attorneys and accountants half a world away are waking up and checking their email accounts for the work they'll be doing. Their work products will be waiting in the U.S. firms' email bins, when those partners boot up the next morning back in Jersey or New York.
The sad fact is that a good education no longer guarantees a high-paying position in America. Often, the 21st century version of the 20th century assembly line is a room full of cubicles equipped with computers.
Unions have fallen out of fashion. Only 6.9 percent of the private-sector workforce is organized today. To some extent, unions got what they deserved. John Mitchell of my dad's UMW called a nationwide strike in the midst of WWII. Jimmy Hoffa drove his Teamsters down the road to perdition. The Longshoremen were riddled with Reds. In other words, the big unions are no more immune to greed and megalomania than are the big banks and corporations.
Just the same, if the challenges facing the younger generation resemble those that faced their grandfathers, then maybe the solution is also similar: an International Knowledge Workers Union.
CLAIRE:
Technology is an amazing blessing, and a complex curse. Today many jobs can be accomplished from anywhere in the world, as long as there's an Internet connection nearby, and more and more employees are working from home part- or full-time. It's often more convenient for the employer and the employee, and almost always cheaper.
On the other hand, working remotely has the effect of turning real people into abstract concepts. I'm sure I'm not the first person to have ever gotten a bit ill tempered while talking on the phone to an IT worker about the problems I'm having with my Dell laptop - because let's face it, it's a lot easier to yell at some guy in India, whom you've never met before, over the phone than it is to yell at someone in person. It's difficult to feel a human connection with a distant, disembodied voice, and so we often treat those voices like machines rather than people.
Add to that the proliferation of social media websites, such as Facebook and Twitter, where people routinely gain thousands of "friends" without ever having a single meaningful interaction, and I think it's clear why any international union would be difficult to organize. Forming a group of people who have never met, whose members are no more than email addresses to one another, does not strike me as the most efficient path to camaraderie. How can we have our Norma Rae moment if we can barely even picture the people with whom we're supposed to be uniting?
Finally, because technology has made many jobs so mobile, those jobs simply can't be compared to more traditional forms of labor. A teachers' strike can be crippling to a community, but if a company's information technology workers (who happen to be working from China) go on strike, the infrastructure can be moved to different workers (living anywhere from India to Indianapolis) in no time at all. When employers have such flexibility, what leverage do the workers have?
... and Mitt lacks wit.
Image via Wikipedia
James -- Mitt Romney spoke in front of 65,000 empty seats at Ford Field in Detroit today to outline his economic plan. With all eyes on the Michigan primary next week, this is a critical time to spread the truth. The differences between his plan and President Obama's go much farther than the fact that he would've "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt." We've laid out a few in this week's tipsheet. Take a look, then pass these on right now while the story's still hot: #1 KEEPING HIS WORD: THE AMERICAN AUTO INDUSTRY As Romney speaks in Detroit, folks shouldn't forget that he and every other GOP candidate opposed the auto recovery, preferring to let the industry go bankrupt. From Day One, President Obama has stood with the American auto industry, saying, "We cannot, and must not, and we will not let our auto industry simply vanish." He's kept his word: More than 1.4 million American auto industry jobs have been saved, 200,000 created, and more than 150,000 are expected in the next few years. Make sure folks know who's on the right side of this one. Pass it on: #2 GOP CANDIDATES ANNOUNCE TAX PLANS THAT WOULD EXPLODE DEFICIT Not a day goes by without hearing Romney and Santorum push for cutting the corporate tax rate. But what you don't hear is how they'll pay for it. President Obama plans to make our businesses more competitive by cutting the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 28 percent -- and closing special-interest loopholes and subsidies to cover the difference. Romney and Santorum want to cut it, too, but they're sure not willing to close any special loopholes to do it. They actually offer no plan to make up the difference, meaning these corporate savings add straight to the deficit. Keep these self-proclaimed budget hawks honest: #3 MITT FIGHTS TO KEEP THE CARRIED INTEREST TAX LOOPHOLE Carried interest is tax jargon for letting Wall Street private equity and hedge fund managers pay a lower tax rate than most middle-class Americans -- and Mitt Romney is determined to protect it. Why? Maybe because he's earned $13 million from it the past two years, and paid a 15 percent rate when his normal income would be taxed at more than double. President Obama recently announced he'd close this loophole, saving $13 billion in the next 10 years. Folks need to know that when the President's working towards a system where everyone pays their fair share, Mitt Romney's working to protect millionaires and billionaires. Read more on carried interest, and tell others, too: #4 ROMNEY HEADLINES KOCH BROTHERS EVENT Tomorrow, Mitt Romney will be speaking at an event sponsored by the Koch brothers. These are the same guys who made their billions by jacking up prices at the pump -- and have already spent millions spreading lies about climate change science. It's good to remember that, while President Obama has outlined a strategy to ease gas prices, Mitt Romney quintupled a tax on gas as governor -- on top of the gas tax Massachusetts motorists were already paying. Get the truth here -- and spread the word: #5 MITT ROMNEY: THE MOST EXTREME ON IMMIGRATION In case you missed Wednesday's GOP debate, Mitt Romney reaffirmed his position as the most extreme GOP candidate on immigration. He praised Arizona's radical anti-immigration law, SB 1070, which forces all immigrants to carry "alien registration" documents and allows police to question them at any time, with or without cause. Add this to his support of encouraging "self-deportation" and promise to veto the DREAM Act, and you can see why he wins at being most extreme. Make sure folks know he actually called Arizona's immigration law a model for the nation. Spread the word now: It takes a lot of time to sort out and fight back on this stuff, but I know that with you on our side, we can get the truth out there. Thanks for your help, Stephanie P.S. -- After you've spread the word, kick back and enjoy this:http://my.barackobama.com/Sweet-Home-Chicago |
Friday, February 24, 2012
Detroit Mercy seeks a Provost
Dear Dr. Castagnera:
We are writing to request your help in identifying outstanding persons who should be considered for the position of Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs at the University of Detroit Mercy (UDM).
This opportunity for academic leadership of the largest Catholic university in Michigan is outstanding. The new provost will join recently appointed President Antoine Garibaldi as “first among equals” in the President’s Cabinet. The Provost, in collaboration with the Academic Leadership Team and the faculty, will play a key role in advancing UDM’s distinguished history of educational accomplishment and service to the city of Detroit and the state of Michigan.
A complete search profile for this position, including application details, is available on the AGB Search website at www.AGBSearch.com or by accessing this link:
http://agbsearch.com/searches/provost-and-vice-president-academic-affairs-university-detroit-mercy
Additional information is available on the university website at www.udmercy.edu.
If you know of individuals who offer the potential for exceptional leadership for UDM, please let us know. All names and information will be received in complete confidence.
We would be pleased to hear from you if you are interested in exploring this opportunity. As noted in the search profile, this search is nearing the final stage. However, the search committee will continue to accept application materials until March 9. The new provost is expected to assume office on July 1, 2012.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this position.
Sincerely,
Blenda J. Wilson, Ph.D.
Senior Consultant
AGB Search
bjw@AGBSearch.com
781-475-2414
Thomas B. Courtice, Ph.D.
Senior Consultant
AGB Search
tbc@AGBSearch.com
614-395-3229
Feeding at the trough
http://chronicle.com/blogs/ticker/for-profit-colleges-get-majority-of-education-benefits-of-active-duty-service-members/40800?sid=pm&utm_source=pm&utm_medium=en
Image: Tom Curtis / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
http://harkin.senate.gov/documents/pdf/4f468d002ae0a.pdf
It's not the vets who are benefitting. Take a guess who is:
http://chronicle.com/article/Graphic-CEO-Compensation-at/66017/
Well, at least these CEO's are "Gainfully employed" thanks to Uncle Sam's largess!
Image: Tom Curtis / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
http://harkin.senate.gov/documents/pdf/4f468d002ae0a.pdf
It's not the vets who are benefitting. Take a guess who is:
http://chronicle.com/article/Graphic-CEO-Compensation-at/66017/
Well, at least these CEO's are "Gainfully employed" thanks to Uncle Sam's largess!
Adjunct faculty: the tip of the spear
In previous posts, I've highlighted a book I read recently called THE GLOBAL AUCTION in which the authors argue that knowledge workers are the new assembly line workers, and that being well-educated and being in the knowledge business do not insure a fulfilling career or a good return on investment. This fact is underlined by the plight of the growing numbers of adjunct faculty in American higher education, as the following story confirms:
http://chronicle.com/article/Accidental-Activist-Collects/130854/?sid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
http://copy--paste.com/
http://adjunctproject.com/flash-tales-100-word-snippets-of-adjunct-life/
http://chronicle.com/article/Accidental-Activist-Collects/130854/?sid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
http://copy--paste.com/
http://adjunctproject.com/flash-tales-100-word-snippets-of-adjunct-life/
Thursday, February 23, 2012
More evidence of why for-profit educational organizations are not the answer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)