Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Supremes to hear arguments in case of liar who claimed he'd won the Medal of Honor

http://jonathanturley.org/2012/02/19/lying-about-receiving-a-medal-of-honor-its-shameful-but-it-shouldnt-be-a-crime/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Medalsofhonor2.jpg

Or was this blabbermouth merely exercising his First Amendment rights?

Decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals:




United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Xavier ALVAREZ, aka Javier RGK-1 Alvarez, Defendant-Appellant.



No. 08-50345.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 2009.
Filed Aug. 17, 2010.

Background: Defendant was convicted in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, R. Gary Klausner, J., of falsely verbally claiming to have received the Congressional Medal of Honor, in violation of the Stolen Valor Act, and he appealed.


Holding: The Court of Appeals, Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judge, held that Act was facially invalid under the First Amendment, and was unconstitutionally applied to make a criminal out of a man who was proven to be nothing more than a liar.

Reversed and remanded.


Bybee, Circuit Judge, filed dissenting opinion.




West Headnotes


[1] Headnote Citing References KeyCite Citing References for this Headnote

Key Number Symbol92 Constitutional Law
   Key Number Symbol92XVIII Freedom of Speech, Expression, and Press
     Key Number Symbol92XVIII(H) Law Enforcement; Criminal Conduct
       Key Number Symbol92k1807 k. Particular offenses in general. Most Cited Cases

Key Number Symbol169 False Personation Headnote Citing References KeyCite Citing References for this Headnote
   Key Number Symbol169k1 k. Nature of offense in general. Most Cited Cases

Stolen Valor Act, which proscribed false verbal or written representations about one's being awarded Congressionally authorized military honors and decorations, was facially invalid under the First Amendment, and was unconstitutionally applied to make a criminal out of a man who was proven to be nothing more than a liar; Act was not sufficiently analogous to an antidefamation law or anti-fraud law to bring it within the scope of the historical First Amendment exceptions for laws punishing defamation or fraud, and Act was not narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling governmental interest in honoring and motivating the troops. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 1; 18 U.S.C.A. § 704(b, c).

[2] Headnote Citing References KeyCite Citing References for this Headnote

Key Number Symbol92 Constitutional Law
   Key Number Symbol92VI Enforcement of Constitutional Provisions
     Key Number Symbol92VI(C) Determination of Constitutional Questions
       Key Number Symbol92VI(C)3 Presumptions and Construction as to Constitutionality
         Key Number Symbol92k1006 Particular Issues and Applications
           Key Number Symbol92k1018 k. Freedom of speech, expression, and press. Most Cited Cases

Key Number Symbol92 Constitutional Law Headnote Citing References KeyCite Citing References for this Headnote
   Key Number Symbol92XVIII Freedom of Speech, Expression, and Press
     Key Number Symbol92XVIII(A) In General
       Key Number Symbol92XVIII(A)1 In General
         Key Number Symbol92k1490 k. In general. Most Cited Cases

All speech is presumably protected against government interference by First Amendment, and government is left to demonstrate, either through a well-crafted statute or case-specific application, the historical basis for or a compelling need to remove some speech from protection; although such an approach may result in protection for a number of lies, which are often nothing more than the distasteful abuse of the First Amendment privilege, it is constitutionally required because the general freedom from government interference with speech, and the general freedom to engage in public and private conversations without the government injecting itself into the discussion as the arbiter of truth, contribute to the “breathing space” the First Amendment needs to survive. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 1.

[3] Headnote Citing References KeyCite Citing References for this Headnote

Key Number Symbol92 Constitutional Law
   Key Number Symbol92XVIII Freedom of Speech, Expression, and Press
     Key Number Symbol92XVIII(H) Law Enforcement; Criminal Conduct
       Key Number Symbol92k1800 k. In general. Most Cited Cases

First Amendment prohibits criminally punishing negligent speech about matters of public concern. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 1.

[4] Headnote Citing References KeyCite Citing References for this Headnote

Key Number Symbol237 Libel and Slander
   Key Number Symbol237IV Actions
     Key Number Symbol237IV(A) Right of Action and Defenses
       Key Number Symbol237k73 k. Persons entitled to sue. Most Cited Cases

Right against defamation belongs to natural persons, not to governmental institutions or symbols.

[5] Headnote Citing References KeyCite Citing References for this Headnote

Key Number Symbol92 Constitutional Law
   Key Number Symbol92XVIII Freedom of Speech, Expression, and Press
     Key Number Symbol92XVIII(H) Law Enforcement; Criminal Conduct
       Key Number Symbol92k1800 k. In general. Most Cited Cases

For First Amendment purposes, false factual speech as a general category is not, and cannot be, proscribed under threat of criminal prosecution. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 1.


West Codenotes



Held Unconstitutional


18 U.S.C.A. § 704

No comments:

Post a Comment